|

Reflections on impeachment, 20 years later

PETER O’CONNOR
Staff Columnist
oconnor@lbknews.com

Declarations, By Peggy Noonan The Wall Street Journal (Saturday/Sunday, December 1-2, 2018)

“A tragedy for Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky and America. He could have averted it by apologizing.”

“December marks the 20th  anniversary of Bill Clinton’s impeachment.  There are many recent retrospectives on the scandal that led to it, including  Independent Counsel Ken Starr’s mildly indignant  ‘Contempt’ and Alex Gibney’s superb documentary series ‘The Clinton Affair.’

As I look back 20 years on, I am more indignant about some aspects, less about others.

I didn’t believe the story when I first heard it – presidents and staffers don’t carry on like that.  When I came to see that it was true, I was angry.  I wrote angrily in these pages.

I see it now more as a tragedy than a scandal.  I am more convinced than ever that Mr. Clinton made the epic political miscalculation of the 20th century’s latter half.  He had two choices when news of the affair was uncovered: tell the truth and pay the price, or lie and hope to get away with it.

If he’d told the truth, even accompanied by a moving public apology, the toll would have been enormous. He would have taken a hellacious political  beating, with a steep slide in public approval and in stature.  He would have been an object of loathing and ridicule – the goat in the White House, a laughingstock.  Members of his party would have come down on him like a ton of bricks.  Newt Gingrich and the Republicans would have gleefully rubbed his face in it every day.  There would have been calls for impeachment.

It would have lasted many months.  And he would have survived and his presidency continued.”

Noonan continues:  “Much more important – here is why it is a tragedy – it wouldn’t have dragged America through the mud.  It only would have dragged him through the mud. His full  admission of culpability would have averted the false testimony in a criminal investigation that became the basis for the Starr report and the two articles of impeachment the House approved.

The American people would’ve forgiven him the affair.  We know this because they’d already forgiven him when they first elected him.  There had been credible allegations of affairs during the 1992 campaign.  Voters had never thought highly of  him in that area.  His nickname the day he was inaugurated was ‘Slick Willie.’

If he had chosen the path of honesty, Americans wouldn’t have backed impeaching him because they are adults and have also made mistakes and committed sins.   

And we know Mr. Clinton  would have been forgiven because in September 1998 – after the Starr report was released, amid all the mud and lies about thongs and cigars – a Gallup poll asked, ‘Based on what you know at this point, do you think that Bill Clinton should or should not be impeached and removed from office?’  Sixty-five percent answered  ‘should not be”

Noonan continues with more:  “Bill Clinton, political genius, didn’t understand his country’s heart.

And so he lied: ‘I want you to listen to me . . . .  I did not have sexual relations  with that woman, Miss Lewinsky’ – and the year of hell, the cultural catastrophe, followed.  That’s what it was  a year in which 8-year olds learned about oral sex from the radio on he way home from school, and 10-year olds came to understand that important adults lie, angrily and consistently, and teenagers knew if the president can do it , I can do it.  It marked the end of a certain mystique of leadership, and it damaged the mystique of American democracy.  All of America’s air waves were full of sludge – phone sex and blue dresses.  The scandal lowered everything.

It was a tragedy because in lying and trying to protect himself, Mr.Clinton  was deciding not to protect America.  And that is the unforgivable sin,that he put America through that,  not what happened with Monica.

Mr. Clinton’s foes made the catastrophe worse.  The independent counsel was obliged by law to ‘ advise the House of Representatives of any substantial and credible information  . . . that may constitute grounds for impeachment.’  The Starr report ran 452 pages and contained an astonishing level of sexual detail , of prurient , gratuitous specificity.  Congress could have withheld it from the public or released an expurgated version.  It didn’t have to be so humiliating.

But Mr. Clinton’s enemies made sure it was.

Almost immediately on receiving the Starr report, Congress voted to release it in full, ‘so that the fullest details of  his sins could be made public,’  as Ken Gormley writes in his expansive 2010 history of the scandal, The Death of American Virtue: Clinton vs. Starr.’  They put it on the web.  Its contents wound up on every screen in America, every newspaper, every television and radio.

Lawmakers released the videotape of Mr. Clinton’s grand-jury testimony, so everyone could see the handsome presidential liar squirm.  Mr. Starr’s staffers said they needed extremely detailed, concrete specificity to make the American people understand what happened.  At the time I assumed that was true in a legal sense.  Now I look back and see mere blood lust and misjudgment.”

Ms. Noonan concludes:

“I see the desire to rub Mr. Clinton’s face in it.

Top to bottom, left to right, a more dignified government, one that cared more about America’s children and its international stature, would have shown more self-restraint and forbearance.  And there might have been just a little pity for the desperate, cornered liar who’d defiled his office.”

Tags: , ,

Longboat Key News

Leave a Reply